RYA National Hornet Association Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Public > Events - Championships
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Teignmouth Feedback
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Teignmouth Feedback

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
Administrator View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 24 November 2003
Status: Offline
Points: 33
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Administrator Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Teignmouth Feedback
    Posted: 17 August 2004 at 10:03
So the championships are over for another year, well at least on the sailing side.

Your committee needs your "gloves off" feedback ready for a de-brief with Teign Corinthian on the 26th August and as input to make next years championships even better. So come on get writing.
Back to Top
Brett View Drop Down
Members
Members


Joined: 04 February 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 38
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Brett Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 August 2004 at 15:33

OK I'll start it off.

The most obvious problem was Easterlies, difficult to see how they could deal with that, other than launching in the harbour.

The ramp worked well, but could do with being at least one plank wider. It was also suggested to me that, if the ramp was contructed over a groyne we would have more beach avalible. Also that if they opened up the top of one of the groynes they would double the beach/launching area?

They probably needed more people in the water at retrevial time?

They need to provide a hosing off area that is away from the ramp.

I though the on the water organisation was very good and they turned the races round very quickly.

What is the feeling re trapezoid courses?

The showers in the Lido were terrible.

Car parking worked well and was reasonable.

Atmosphere in the club was good but we need a sit down venue for a formal meal/gala dinner.

What are we looking for in the way of socials?

Would you want to go back ther in 3 or 4 years time?

That's all I can think of for now.

Please have your say, we need to know what you guys and girls are looking for and Teignmouth are keen to improve their act.

Thanks

 

Brett

Back to Top
Lis Woods View Drop Down
Members
Members


Joined: 07 June 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lis Woods Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 August 2004 at 18:53

How about  sound signals that you can hear on the water  eg guns,  and some flags that are big enought to see.

Might it help if a rib crossed the fleet on general recall?

 

Lis

Back to Top
Tom Guy View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 04 February 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 571
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tom Guy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 August 2004 at 10:14

"The ramp worked well, but could do with being at least one plank wider"

The plastic boats are only 30mm wider in total, does this really justify a whole plank more.....

 

Back to Top
Rob S View Drop Down
Members
Members


Joined: 16 June 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 6
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rob S Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 August 2004 at 11:38

In general a well organised and enjoyable event - shame about the unbookable weather.

Changing facilities could certainly do with an upgrade.  Glad they sorted out the bar opening times early on in the week - even if you did have to be changed first.  Venue for the buffet / prize giving was too small.  I think the club certainly missed out not providing any galley facilities in the morning or after racing.  As for the trapezoid - most enjoyable, shame we only managed it once.  A couple of longer races would of been nice.

On the plus side, nice friendly club.  Registration was well organised, food was very nice.  Launching and recovery was o.k. and we always had our trolley waiting for us.  

Back to Top
Harry Ashworth View Drop Down
Members
Members


Joined: 01 June 2004
Location: wolverhampton
Status: Offline
Points: 735
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Harry Ashworth Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 August 2004 at 13:22

1.The risk of being unable to launch in an Easterly creates a big doubt about the venue.

2."Umpire 1" was pompous and patronising.

3. It was appalling that a redress hearing was held in the bar - private facilities are essential.

4. I totally agree about the inaudible sound signals, especially with the current 5 min sequence.

5.The town was fine with a variety of accom and entertainment for family - cleanest public toilets ever!

6. The beach party was inadequate and young / strong wetsuited people in the surf should have been provided.

 

The following applies to the Hornet side of things:-

7. There was no scrutineering so we got up at 0430 for nothing

8. There should have been a measurer on sat as promised, 0800 on raceday is a bit late if there is a measurement problem.

9. How far ahead is the class planning future venues? If we are too small for quality venues what about doubling up with another class?

 
Back to Top
Alex View Drop Down
Members
Members


Joined: 15 June 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 24
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Alex Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 August 2004 at 10:08
Hi Harry,
 
Did you get my message?
not sure if this private message thing works?
Back to Top
Tom Guy View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 04 February 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 571
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tom Guy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 August 2004 at 13:55

Thanks everyone for their contribution so far. It gives the committee something to work on. Although TCYC are hoping for our feedback this week, this time limit does not apply to us so your comments however late will be gratefully received.

As for my own comments:

1. Firstly a big thank you has to go to Brett for organising a great  championship with minimal assistance, other than the committee's feedback on occasions. This does highlight one of the eternal problems with the championship management i.e. it is left in the hands of one person to sort all the issues. I'm sure on hindsight, like his predecessors in this post, he would enlisted some more help from his local fleet. This is something we need to discuss within the committee, but ultimately I think we will need divide the work in to more managable tasks in an effort to reduce the workload on the main organiser. I know from personal experience, this role does not enhance your sailing at the championship! Of course, outwardly I suspect that very few people realised how busy Brett was leading up to and during the week. Well done Brett.

2. The easterly's were unfortunate for us (although the waves were good fun). I agree that we would have to question its suitability for this reason. However, I wonder how many venues we have vistied over the last few years would have allowed to launch with a decent on shore breeze. (Pwhelli, Thorpe Bay, Lowestoft?). One to consider..

3. Just a couple of comments regarded Harry's issues directed to the class:

Scrutineering - those who have been with the class for a number of years will realise that we are not over officious when in comes to measurement. In past years this has been restricted to weighing of boats and possible checks of black bands. This year, there was no weighing organised partly because of the hassle (poor excuse unless you are one organising it!) but more importantly because there were no news boats. I already of a couple of re-deckings planned for next year, so weighing will back on the cards. In all fairness, scrutineering did not happen because it revolves the same few people to organise who were already overloaded. In the future, we will clearer about what form it will take. Refer to pint 2 about management of this task in future championships.

Measurement - my fault. When our measuring Jim Wood sent me his apologises for the AGM and the championship, I forgot to link his measurement role with the championship (work sometimes gets in the way). Brett was busy trying to find a measurer during the week leading up to the championship, but the best we could do was Sunday morning. Again it does highlight another issue in that we have only one measurer who is an active sailor in the class. With a slight sloping of my shoulders i will pass this back to our Technical Representative.

Future venues - big subject with lots of history. Planning a week long championship venues with a relatively small has become very difficult task which is why we have recently moved to less established venues. Having had our fingers burnt once for a much lower than expected attendance at Pwhelli, we are reluctant to commit the class too much financially. Even where we have agreement with clubs, this is no guarantee that the club will fulfill their promise (Looe 2003 - it did not happen).

To reduce the financial burden, we have shared with other classes. However without exception I think I would be right in stating that the sharing has been detrimental to the event as a whole. For example we shared Penzance with Contenders but the club could not cope with the numbers in the clubhouse or in the dinghy park. Most importantly despite sailing the same courses and being of similar speed, the fleets were not compatiable on the water. I think we would probably accuse the Contenders of being a little too aggressive for our liking. And I think this is the nub of the problem, trying to find a compatiable fleet on and off the water at a suitable club.

I would welcome any suggestions for suitable fleets/clubs, perhaps this should be raised as a separate subject.

 

 

 

 

Back to Top
Strangler View Drop Down
Committee
Committee


Joined: 05 February 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 494
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Strangler Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 August 2004 at 22:54

Something I meant to mention at the time but forgot-

One of the support boats had RESCUE or similar written along the hull. I presume this was from the Surf and Life Saving Club. This seems to be bad practise if this boat is only patrolling the racing. The race committee could be laying themselves open to a serious liability claim from joe public.

 

Course laid too close to shore in offshore winds.

 

Gate was very short in one race.

 

Olympic triangle- reaches too broad ie too short.

 

The dolphins did not know the right of way rules.

 

Better if the weeks parking was Sat to Fri rather than Sun to Sat.

 

Lido showers did improve half way thru week

 

Would I go back – “does a one-legged duck swim in circles”.

Cheers Strangler
Back to Top
Strangler View Drop Down
Committee
Committee


Joined: 05 February 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 494
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Strangler Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 September 2004 at 19:22

Champs photos can be found at

www.fotoboat.com

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 10.18
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.070 seconds.